Author
|
Thread |
|
|
'Mage
Joined: 28 Feb 2001
Posts: 322
Location: canada |
Math problem, have been looking everywhere
how do i find a basis for the subspace w of p_3 with the property p(2) = 0? and for that matter given only a general equation of a subspace is there a way to build a basis for that subspace? would it work if i took 4 arbitrary polynomials with that property and degree at most 3, stuck them in a matrix and row reduced? _________________ ~Mage
|
Thu Mar 04, 2004 10:10 pm |
|
|
DjinnKahn
Joined: 12 May 2001
Posts: 579
Location: Okemos, MI |
hmm, i haven't studied this, but i'm curious :)
is p_3 the set of equations of the form f(x) = Ax^3 + Bx^2 + Cx + D?
so x^3, x^2, x, 1 would be one basis ??
and (x-2)^3, (x-2)^2, (x-2), 1 would be another basis??
but p(2) = 0 doesn't hold for the basis '1' ... i assume that "p(2) = 0" means each basis equation should equal 0 when x=2 ???
maybe it's just (x-2)^3, (x-2)^2, x-2 ??
let me know if i'm making sense or if this is just crazy talk
|
Fri Mar 05, 2004 12:58 am |
|
|
'Mage
Joined: 28 Feb 2001
Posts: 322
Location: canada |
i think you might be right djinn, but i think that its (x-2), (x-2)x, (x-2)x^2 althought im really not sure, im a little hazy on the basis thing and my teacher is terrible and our book is terrible, i cant wait till next year when i can stop taking bullshit applied math and get the the goodies of number theory, group theory, ring theory and graph theory _________________ ~Mage
|
Fri Mar 05, 2004 11:39 pm |
|
|
WyZe
Joined: 19 Apr 2002
Posts: 547
|
Damn, and i'm having a hard time with chem 12.
|
Sat Mar 06, 2004 11:03 am |
|
|
Ocram-OB
Joined: 05 Aug 2003
Posts: 2600
|
quote:
Originally posted by WyZe
Damn, and i'm having a hard time with chem 12.
what's the problem there?
|
Sat Mar 06, 2004 11:21 am |
|
|
'Mage
Joined: 28 Feb 2001
Posts: 322
Location: canada |
welp the answer turned out to be neither of those, if your interested dk ill post it for yah _________________ ~Mage
|
Sat Mar 06, 2004 8:18 pm |
|
|
DjinnKahn
Joined: 12 May 2001
Posts: 579
Location: Okemos, MI |
Sure, I'm curious... if it's not too much trouble
|
Sun Mar 07, 2004 10:54 am |
|
|
'Mage
Joined: 28 Feb 2001
Posts: 322
Location: canada |
ok so p(x) = a0+a1x+a2x^2+a3x^3
and
p(2) = a0+2a1+4a2+8a3 = 0
set a1 = s, a2 = t, a3 = r so
p(x) = (-2s-4t-8r)+sx+tx^2+rx^3 = s(-2+x) + t(-4+x^2) + r(-8+x^3)
and {-2+X, -4+x^2, -8+x^3} is a basis for W (well it spans but check linear independance and we see its a basis)
so we were on the right track, and there are a lot of basis's for this im sure maybe ours are also basis's but i think with this way we are ensured that our answer spans so all we have to do is check if its linearly independant and the way we did it we would have to check to see if our things span? _________________ ~Mage
|
Sun Mar 07, 2004 6:48 pm |
|
|
GaNzTheLegend
Joined: 01 Jan 2001
Posts: 8287
Location: Toronto, Canada |
woah what is this 11th grade math?
|
Sun Mar 07, 2004 7:40 pm |
|
|
'Mage
Joined: 28 Feb 2001
Posts: 322
Location: canada |
university, algebra 2, its mostly proofs _________________ ~Mage
|
Sun Mar 07, 2004 11:42 pm |
|
|
GaNzTheLegend
Joined: 01 Jan 2001
Posts: 8287
Location: Toronto, Canada |
I seem to recall doing stuff like that in grade 11.
|
Mon Mar 08, 2004 8:31 am |
|
|
Necrophilic
Joined: 22 Nov 2003
Posts: 400
|
grade 11 math? you live in Canada
|
Mon Mar 08, 2004 3:32 pm |
|
|
DjinnKahn
Joined: 12 May 2001
Posts: 579
Location: Okemos, MI |
mage: ah, so { (x-2), (x-2)x, (x-2)x^2 } is correct too... since we can create {-2+X, -4+x^2, -8+x^3} from it (factor out (x-2) from everything, and then it is obvious). too bad we didn't have a proof :P it seems like any p_2 basis * (x-2) would work.
|
Mon Mar 08, 2004 5:37 pm |
|
|
|