FAQSearchMembersGroupsRegisterProfilePM'sLogin/Logout

Warcraft Occult Forum Index -> Starcraft II General Discussion

Viking vs Phoenix vs Corruptor (pros and cons)

  Author    Thread Post new topic Reply to topic
Kalmah



Joined: 27 Sep 2010
Posts: 51
Viking vs Phoenix vs Corruptor (pros and cons)

Okay, short analysis about flying anti-air units:

Viking:
+ Incredible range
+ Slow attack, high armor penetrating
+ Ability to harass undefended enemy workers and bases by going on ground form
- Slow attack, not very good against big swarms of air units
- Ground form is weak
- Slow acceleration
- Low armor
- Relatively slow

Corruptor:
+ Incredible armor
+ Slow attack, high armor penetrating
- Passove Corruption ability which increases the damage done to the target
- Slow attack, not very good against big swarms of air units
- No instant ability for killing ground units (only transform to brood mother)
- Range is short compared to vikings

Phoenix:
+ Fast acceleration and maximum speed
+ Ability to attack while moving
+ Fast attack, good against big swarms of air units
+ Ability to lift ground units to air, making them killable by the phoenix
- Fast attack, bad armor penetrating
- Range is short compared to vikings
- Low armor

Post Tue Oct 12, 2010 4:54 am 
 View user's profile Send private message  Reply with quote  
Rat



Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 1045

how can slow attack be a + thing.
_________________
GreenHorn: Nexus cried every time I beat him but still thought he was better.

Post Tue Oct 12, 2010 5:47 am 
 View user's profile Send private message  Reply with quote  
Sparkz102



Joined: 27 Feb 2003
Posts: 2999
Location: War2

corruptors also have 100+hp than phoenix or viking
_________________
I am also a contradiction of my own lies

Post Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:45 am 
 View user's profile Send private message AIM Address  Reply with quote  
Kalmah



Joined: 27 Sep 2010
Posts: 51
Re: Viking vs Phoenix vs Corruptor (pros and cons)

quote:
Originally posted by Rat
how can slow attack be a + thing.



Mainly because then the damage comes in big doses, which means high armor value isn't as effective as against series of smaller damage checks like Marines's machine guns.

Post Wed Oct 13, 2010 6:23 am 
 View user's profile Send private message  Reply with quote  
turtleman@can



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Posts: 8841
Location: Canada

to explain further:
Say you've got a corruptor that does 30 DPS and shoots every second.
This means that it basically shoots for 30 damage every single time. If a unit has 5 armor, this is mitigated so it would do 25 damage.

Now take a marine and let's say it does 30 DPS, and shoots 3 times per second. Each shot does 10 damage, against the same armored unit it would do 5 damage each shot. Totalling 15 damage. So the benefit is that it does more actual DPS because less of it's shots are mitigated by the armor which is why slow firing units are counters to high armored units.

Post Wed Oct 13, 2010 12:15 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message  Reply with quote  
Kalmah



Joined: 27 Sep 2010
Posts: 51

Yep, that explains why its not very wise to do mass lings against fully upgraded ultra lisks =D

Post Wed Oct 13, 2010 11:58 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message  Reply with quote  
  Display posts from previous:      
Post new topic Reply to topic

Forum Jump:
Jump to:  
Page 1 of 1

Last Thread | Next Thread  >

Forum Rules:
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 
< Contact Us - Home >

Powered by phpBB: © 2001 phpBB Group
Templates Copyright ©2001, 2002, Nick Mahon.
Converted to phpBB2 Final by Stefan Paulus | phpbb2-users.de