Currently, if someone does not send an ss on request, then they will be banned for 1 week, and their main aka will be revealed.

One argument is that all aka's be revealed upon request, to enable players to ban the banned players from their games should he/she decide to circumvent their ban.

Another argument is against the revelation of all aka's as it is seen purely as a spiteful act in which the accuser solely seeks to damage the banned player's reputation even more, thus making the request "vindictive".

The final argument is that The_G0D is quite a legendary Warcraft 2 player, some say the best to ever grace these lands, and he shouldn't let this worry him, because not even hackers can come close to bringing him down from the #1 title of being the best Warcraft 2 player this side of the cosmos.
_________________
<[TD]ViRuZ> You have balls...I like balls

fuck I voted yes instead of option 3. we're under a lawl-a-ttack.
_________________
<[TD]ViRuZ> You have balls...I like balls

Voted no.
_________________
GreenHorn: Nexus cried every time I beat him but still thought he was better.

No

Either vote 3 or explain your actions.
_________________
<[TD]ViRuZ> You have balls...I like balls

I think it makes some sense to reveal all known names... that way people will know which names may have been hacking against them in the past.

Like, say (obviously completely hypothetically) KHB was playing on his own name and got caught. Then I look at the aka list and see 67mph on there. For everyone that's lost to 67mph or been considering him very good, doesn't it make sense for you to know he was caught hacking on another name? Also this would prevent him from just switching back to 67mph, taking refuge there, and being considered legit by everyone even though he just got caught hacking.

Voted yes.

obv yes. what wrong with your pro hacking policy?

but we could think of exposing only 20+ games akas, just to ignore the worthless, unknown ones.

if a legit player decides to smurf and beat someone. His superior skills can be misstaken for hacking.
_________________
GreenHorn: Nexus cried every time I beat him but still thought he was better.

It makes sense to reveal all known names, but not the smurfs.

Voted yes,

im shocked by the amount of players voting no


means they smurf to hack?


it would be great if the admins reveal akas as a standard procedure

currently u have to keep asking admin to reveal aka quite a few posts before blid replies, 'oh no, it was a nobody, noone important'


let me get this straight


I WANT EVERY SINGLE MOTHERFUCKING SMURF NAME OF THE HACKING IDIOT


thanks

i dont know about you but i have good memory, and i can ban even 'nobodys'


p.s. i didnt get any akas of my last 3 accusations.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Rat
if a legit player decides to smurf and beat someone. His superior skills can be misstaken for hacking.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Ywfn
It makes sense to reveal all known names, but not the smurfs.

---

IF by smurfs you understand "semi(or well) known guy that came from nowhere and must be a smurf"... these accounts should be revealed

The "worthless shitty name with less than X games that nobody knows/remembers" is just not worth wasting our time (some players have thousands of 0, 1 or 2 games played on them)

Yes! Makes perfect sense..
Why would we protect hackers in ANY way? Its not fun playing with them, their personallities are
terrible..
Ban and expose the fuckers!

YES!

perhaps only recently played on akas should be released.... like dont give away the dude's 400 game smurf name he hasnt used in 2 years... let that mystery still survive... just post his main/recent known names

I think if someone is convicted of hacking, their AKAs should be given

smurfing is gay

quote:

---

Originally posted by Tyrus
smurfing is gay

---

i like tehg0d.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Fast Luck
What do you mean by known? Like names that everyone already knows? Or known as in, names with enough games that people know the name?

---

I think Blid has gotten power happy. Happens to everyone who is given the littlest bit of authority. At first they are fine then later they find excuse after excuse to exert their power.

There is no reason to release every smurf name a person has used. If someone doesn't send an ss, you release their main aka and then ban them for a week(as is done now). The object is to stop them from hacking not to scare them off the server. If they get caught hacking again you ban them longer. This community lynchfest is barbaric.

War2 needs players, players don't need war2. Pretty soon you guys will only have your newb nephews to play.
_________________
I have hacks in my brain and I use them.

It is rare that you know for certain if a player hacked. You just know they cannot produce an SS.
_________________
I have hacks in my brain and I use them.

Man, you're such a nancy square poofter.

Get out.
_________________
<[TD]ViRuZ> You have balls...I like balls

quote:

---

Originally posted by The_G0D
Man, you're such a nancy square poofter.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by The_G0D
Man, you're such a nancy square poofter.

Get out.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by 7VlesSiah

quote:

---

Originally posted by The_G0D
Man, you're such a nancy square poofter.

---

Arguing for rules upon rules is square. I argue for controlled anarchy. I would not call you square, primitive aggression is your motivation.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by 7VlesSiah

Edit: nice animation icon.

---

*meanwhile, after months of countless threads and debating, 7vlessiah still fails to explain how his grid hacks isn't an advantage.*
_________________
<[TD]ViRuZ> You have balls...I like balls

He should just draw a grid on hes monitor with a slim marker.. So other advantages are gone, but
he will still know how to place a tower Everyone happy!
_________________
Pinky and the Brain